MiCA Recital (86) — preamble

MiCA Recital (86) — preamble (86) Crypto-asset service providers that execute orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients should draw up an execution policy and should always aim to obtain the best possible result for their clients, including when they act as a client’s counterparty.

They should take all necessary steps to avoid the misuse by their employees of information related to client orders.

Crypto-asset service providers that receive orders and transmit those orders to other crypto-asset service providers should implement procedures for the prompt and proper sending of those orders.

Crypto-asset service providers should not receive any monetary or non-monetary benefits for transmitting those orders to any particular trading platform for crypto-assets or any other crypto-asset service providers.

They should monitor the effectiveness of their order execution arrangements and execution policy, assessing whether the execution venues included in the order execution policy provide for the best possible result for the client or whether they need to make changes to their execution arrangements, and should notify clients with whom they have an ongoing client relationship of any material changes to their order execution arrangements or execution policy.

32023R1114

Legal text reproduced from the official source under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU. Only the official publication is authentic. This page shows our saved copy of the text. It is not advice and does not decide whether any provision applies to anyone.