MiCA Recital (11) — preamble

MiCA Recital (11) — preamble (11) The fractional parts of a unique and non-fungible crypto-asset should not be considered unique and non-fungible.

The issuance of crypto-assets as non-fungible tokens in a large series or collection should be considered an indicator of their fungibility.

The mere attribution of a unique identifier to a crypto-asset is not, in and of itself, sufficient to classify it as unique and non-fungible.

The assets or rights represented should also be unique and non-fungible in order for the crypto-asset to be considered unique and non-fungible.

The exclusion of crypto-assets that are unique and non-fungible from the scope of this Regulation is without prejudice to the qualification of such crypto-assets as financial instruments.

This Regulation should also apply to crypto-assets that appear to be unique and non-fungible, but whose de facto features or whose features that are linked to their de facto uses, would make them either fungible or not unique.

In that regard, when assessing and classifying crypto-assets, competent authorities should adopt a substance over form approach whereby the features of the crypto-asset in question determine the classification and not its designation by the issuer.

32023R1114

Legal text reproduced from the official source under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU. Only the official publication is authentic. This page shows our saved copy of the text. It is not advice and does not decide whether any provision applies to anyone.