← current version of this provision

AI Act Article 15 — held text

This page is a held version, frozen at the capture below. It is a source for review. It is not advice, and it does not determine whether this provision applies to you.

Article 15 Accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity 1. High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way that they achieve an appropriate level of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity, and that they perform consistently in those respects throughout their lifecycle. 2. To address the technical aspects of how to measure the appropriate levels of accuracy and robustness set out in paragraph 1 and any other relevant performance metrics, the Commission shall, in cooperation with relevant stakeholders and organisations such as metrology and benchmarking authorities, encourage, as appropriate, the development of benchmarks and measurement methodologies. 3. The levels of accuracy and the relevant accuracy metrics of high-risk AI systems shall be declared in the accompanying instructions of use. 4. High-risk AI systems shall be as resilient as possible regarding errors, faults or inconsistencies that may occur within the system or the environment in which the system operates, in particular due to their interaction with natural persons or other systems. Technical and organisational measures shall be taken in this regard. The robustness of high-risk AI systems may be achieved through technical redundancy solutions, which may include backup or fail-safe plans. High-risk AI systems that continue to learn after being placed on the market or put into service shall be developed in such a way as to eliminate or reduce as far as possible the risk of possibly biased outputs influencing input for future operations (feedback loops), and as to ensure that any such feedback loops are duly addressed with appropriate mitigation measures. 5. High-risk AI systems shall be resilient against attempts by unauthorised third parties to alter their use, outputs or performance by exploiting system vulnerabilities. The technical solutions aiming to ensure the cybersecurity of high-risk AI systems shall be appropriate to the relevant circumstances and the risks. The technical solutions to address AI specific vulnerabilities shall include, where appropriate, measures to prevent, detect, respond to, resolve and control for attacks trying to manipulate the training data set (data poisoning), or pre-trained components used in training (model poisoning), inputs designed to cause the AI model to make a mistake (adversarial examples or model evasion), confidentiality attacks or model flaws. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj 61/144 EN OJ L, 12.7.2024 SECTION 3 Obligations of providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems and other parties
CELEX: 32024R1689 · provision: 15
Locator: Article 15; PDF page 61; derived-text line 1555
Held artifact: docs_evidence/eu-legislation/eurlex-full-text/20260823T093000Z/32024R1689.pdf
Artifact SHA-256: bba630444b3278e881066774002a1d7824308934f49ccfa203e65be43692f55e
Captured: 20260823T093000Z
Extracted with: pdftotext version 4.00
Official source: EUR-Lex
This version: /celex/32024R1689/ART_15/20260823-bba63044/
Corpus Merkle root: 581628a5b36518981241d2b51f048aa46384f30a74bf648ef542c652028cdeff
Membership proof: 10 hashes — see corpus-proof.json
Modal verbs, counted verbatim (not a legal characterisation): 'shall not': 0 · 'shall': 9 · 'must': 0 · 'may not': 0 · 'may': 3 · 'should': 0

To verify independently: fetch the official source above, extract it with the named tool, and confirm the artifact SHA-256 matches. Then check this provision's leaf against the published Merkle root using the proof in corpus-proof.json.