← current version of this provision
AI Act Annex XI — held text
This page is a held version, frozen at the capture below. It is a source
for review. It is not advice, and it does not determine whether this provision applies to you.
ANNEX XI Technical documentation referred to in Article 53(1), point (a) -- technical documentation for providers of general-purpose AI models Section 1 Information to be provided by all providers of general-purpose AI models The technical documentation referred to in Article 53(1), point (a) shall contain at least the following information as appropriate to the size and risk profile of the model: 1. A general description of the general-purpose AI model including: (a) the tasks that the model is intended to perform and the type and nature of AI systems in which it can be integrated; (b) the acceptable use policies applicable; (c) the date of release and methods of distribution; (d) the architecture and number of parameters; (e) the modality (e.g. text, image) and format of inputs and outputs; (f) the licence. 2. A detailed description of the elements of the model referred to in point 1, and relevant information of the process for the development, including the following elements: (a) the technical means (e.g. instructions of use, infrastructure, tools) required for the general-purpose AI model to be integrated in AI systems; (b) the design specifications of the model and training process, including training methodologies and techniques, the key design choices including the rationale and assumptions made; what the model is designed to optimise for and the relevance of the different parameters, as applicable; (c) information on the data used for training, testing and validation, where applicable, including the type and provenance of data and curation methodologies (e.g. cleaning, filtering, etc.), the number of data points, their scope and main characteristics; how the data was obtained and selected as well as all other measures to detect the unsuitability of data sources and methods to detect identifiable biases, where applicable; (d) the computational resources used to train the model (e.g. number of floating point operations), training time, and other relevant details related to the training; (e) known or estimated energy consumption of the model. With regard to point (e), where the energy consumption of the model is unknown, the energy consumption may be based on information about computational resources used. Section 2 Additional information to be provided by providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk 1. A detailed description of the evaluation strategies, including evaluation results, on the basis of available public evaluation protocols and tools or otherwise of other evaluation methodologies. Evaluation strategies shall include evaluation criteria, metrics and the methodology on the identification of limitations. 2. Where applicable, a detailed description of the measures put in place for the purpose of conducting internal and/or external adversarial testing (e.g. red teaming), model adaptations, including alignment and fine-tuning. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj 141/144 EN OJ L, 12.7.2024 3. Where applicable, a detailed description of the system architecture explaining how software components build or feed into each other and integrate into the overall processing. 142/144 ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj OJ L, 12.7.2024 EN
CELEX: 32024R1689 · provision: XI
Locator: Annex XI; PDF page 141; derived-text line 4243
Held artifact: docs_evidence/eu-legislation/eurlex-full-text/20260823T093000Z/32024R1689.pdf
Artifact SHA-256: bba630444b3278e881066774002a1d7824308934f49ccfa203e65be43692f55e
Captured: 20260823T093000Z
Extracted with: pdftotext version 4.00
Official source:
EUR-Lex
This version:
/celex/32024R1689/ANNEX_XI/20260823-bba63044/
Corpus Merkle root: 581628a5b36518981241d2b51f048aa46384f30a74bf648ef542c652028cdeff
Membership proof: 10 hashes — see
corpus-proof.json
Modal verbs, counted verbatim (not a legal characterisation): 'shall not': 0 · 'shall': 2 · 'must': 0 · 'may not': 0 · 'may': 1 · 'should': 0
To verify independently: fetch the official source above, extract it with the
named tool, and confirm the artifact SHA-256 matches. Then check this provision's leaf against
the published Merkle root using the proof in corpus-proof.json.