MiCA Recital (33) — preamble

This page is a held version, frozen at the capture below. It is a source for review. It is not advice, and it does not determine whether this provision applies to you.

(33) In order to avoid undue administrative burden, competent authorities should not be required to approve a crypto-asset white paper before its publication. Competent authorities should, however, have the power to request amendments to the crypto-asset white paper and to any marketing communications and, where necessary, to request the inclusion of additional information in the crypto-asset white paper.

CELEX: 32023R1114 · provision: 33
Locator: Recital (33); PDF page 5; derived-text line 333
Held artifact: docs_evidence/eu-legislation/eurlex-full-text/20260823T093000Z/32023R1114.pdf
Artifact SHA-256: 32c6d21e712dbb719a9a6b2d39e85133f3059d9e02d8d9ce70d35332bd568b8b
Captured: 20260823T093000Z
Extracted with: pdftotext version 4.00
Official source: EUR-Lex
This version: /celex/32023R1114/RECITAL_33/20260823-32c6d21e/
Corpus Merkle root: 581628a5b36518981241d2b51f048aa46384f30a74bf648ef542c652028cdeff
Membership proof: 10 hashes — see corpus-proof.json
Modal verbs, counted verbatim (not a legal characterisation): 'shall not': 0 · 'shall': 0 · 'must': 0 · 'may not': 0 · 'may': 0 · 'should': 2

To verify independently: fetch the official source above, extract it with the named tool, and confirm the artifact SHA-256 matches. Then check this provision's leaf against the published Merkle root using the proof in corpus-proof.json.