← current version of this provision
MiCA Article 114 — held text
This page is a held version, frozen at the capture below. It is a source
for review. It is not advice, and it does not determine whether this provision applies to you.
Article 114 Publication of decisions 1. A decision imposing administrative penalties and other administrative measures for an infringement of this Regulation in accordance with Article 111 shall be published by competent authorities on their official websites without undue delay after the natural or legal person subject to that decision has been informed of that decision. The publication shall include at least information on the type and nature of the infringement and the identity of the natural or legal persons responsible. Decisions imposing measures that are of an investigatory nature need not be published. 2. Where the publication of the identity of the legal entities, or the identity or personal data of natural persons, is considered by the competent authority to be disproportionate following a case-by-case assessment conducted on the proportionality of the publication of such data, or where such publication would jeopardise an ongoing investigation, competent authorities shall take one of the following actions: (a) defer the publication of the decision to impose an administrative penalty or other administrative measure until the moment where the reasons for non-publication cease to exist; (b) publish the decision to impose an administrative penalty or other administrative measure on an anonymous basis in a manner which is in conformity with national law, where such anonymous publication ensures the effective protection of the personal data concerned; (c) not publish the decision to impose an administrative penalty or other administrative measure in the event that the options provided for in points (a) and (b) are considered insufficient to ensure: (i) that the stability of financial markets is not jeopardised; (ii) the proportionality of the publication of such a decision with regard to measures which are deemed to be of a minor nature. In the case of a decision to publish an administrative penalty or other administrative measure on an anonymous basis, as referred to in the first subparagraph, point (b), the publication of the relevant data may be deferred for a reasonable period where it is foreseen that within that period the reasons for anonymous publication will cease to exist. 3. Where the decision to impose an administrative penalty or other administrative measure is under appeal before the relevant courts or administrative bodies, competent authorities shall publish, immediately, on their official website such information and any subsequent information on the outcome of such appeal. Moreover, any decision annulling a previous decision to impose administrative penalty or other administrative measure shall also be published. 4. Competent authorities shall ensure that any publication in accordance with this Article remains on their official website for a period of at least five years after its publication. Personal data contained in the publication shall be kept on the official website of the competent authority only for the period which is necessary in accordance with the applicable data protection rules.
CELEX: 32023R1114 · provision: 114
Locator: Article 114; PDF page 77; derived-text line 5208
Held artifact: docs_evidence/eu-legislation/eurlex-full-text/20260823T093000Z/32023R1114.pdf
Artifact SHA-256: 32c6d21e712dbb719a9a6b2d39e85133f3059d9e02d8d9ce70d35332bd568b8b
Captured: 20260823T093000Z
Extracted with: pdftotext version 4.00
Official source:
EUR-Lex
This version:
/celex/32023R1114/ART_114/20260823-32c6d21e/
Corpus Merkle root: 581628a5b36518981241d2b51f048aa46384f30a74bf648ef542c652028cdeff
Membership proof: 10 hashes — see
corpus-proof.json
Modal verbs, counted verbatim (not a legal characterisation): 'shall not': 0 · 'shall': 7 · 'must': 0 · 'may not': 0 · 'may': 1 · 'should': 0
To verify independently: fetch the official source above, extract it with the
named tool, and confirm the artifact SHA-256 matches. Then check this provision's leaf against
the published Merkle root using the proof in corpus-proof.json.