← current version of this provision
DORA Article 58 — held text
This page is a held version, frozen at the capture below. It is a source
for review. It is not advice, and it does not determine whether this provision applies to you.
Article 58 Review clause 1. By 17 January 2028, the Commission shall, after consulting the ESAs and the ESRB, as appropriate, carry out a review and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, where appropriate, by a legislative proposal. The review shall include at least the following: (a) the criteria for the designation of critical ICT third-party service providers in accordance with Article 31(2); (b) the voluntary nature of the notification of significant cyber threats referred to in Article 19; (c) the regime referred to in Article 31(12) and the powers of the Lead Overseer provided for in Article 35(1), point (d), point (iv), first indent, with a view to evaluating the effectiveness of those provisions with regard to ensuring effective oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers established in a third country, and the necessity to establish a subsidiary in the Union. For the purposes of the first subparagraph of this point, the review shall include an analysis of the regime referred to in Article 31(12), including in terms of access for Union financial entities to services from third countries and availability of such services on the Union market and it shall take into account further developments in the markets for the services covered by this Regulation, the practical experience of financial entities and financial supervisors with regard to the application and, respectively, supervision of that regime, and any relevant regulatory and supervisory developments taking place at international level. (d) the appropriateness of including in the scope of this Regulation financial entities referred to in Article 2(3), point (e), making use of automated sales systems, in light of future market developments on the use of such systems; (e) the functioning and effectiveness of the JON in supporting the consistency of the oversight and the efficiency of the exchange of information within the Oversight Framework. 2. In the context of the review of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, the Commission shall assess the need for increased cyber resilience of payment systems and payment-processing activities and the appropriateness of extending the scope of this Regulation to operators of payment systems and entities involved in payment-processing activities. In light of this assessment, the Commission shall submit, as part of the review of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, a report to the European Parliament and the Council no later than 17 July 2023. Based on that review report, and after consulting ESAs, ECB and the ESRB, the Commission may submit, where appropriate and as part of the legislative proposal that it may adopt pursuant to Article 108, second paragraph, of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, a proposal to ensure that all operators of payment systems and entities involved in payment-processing activities are subject to an appropriate oversight, while taking into account existing oversight by the central bank. 27.12.2022 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/75 3. By 17 January 2026, the Commission shall, after consulting the ESAs and the Committee of European Auditing Oversight Bodies, carry out a review and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, where appropriate, by a legislative proposal, on the appropriateness of strengthened requirements for statutory auditors and audit firms as regards digital operational resilience, by means of the inclusion of statutory auditors and audit firms into the scope of this Regulation or by means of amendments to Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (39). Section II Amendments
CELEX: 32022R2554 · provision: 58
Locator: Article 58; PDF page 74; derived-text line 1822
Held artifact: docs_evidence/eu-legislation/eurlex-full-text/20260823T093000Z/32022R2554.pdf
Artifact SHA-256: 85307f9e2a0409826dd0f54489645935816d16e929f0db4db3ef15badd11d38c
Captured: 20260823T093000Z
Extracted with: pdftotext version 4.00
Official source:
EUR-Lex
This version:
/celex/32022R2554/ART_58/20260823-85307f9e/
Corpus Merkle root: 581628a5b36518981241d2b51f048aa46384f30a74bf648ef542c652028cdeff
Membership proof: 10 hashes — see
corpus-proof.json
Modal verbs, counted verbatim (not a legal characterisation): 'shall not': 0 · 'shall': 7 · 'must': 0 · 'may not': 0 · 'may': 2 · 'should': 0
To verify independently: fetch the official source above, extract it with the
named tool, and confirm the artifact SHA-256 matches. Then check this provision's leaf against
the published Merkle root using the proof in corpus-proof.json.