← current version of this provision
DORA Article 40 — held text
This page is a held version, frozen at the capture below. It is a source
for review. It is not advice, and it does not determine whether this provision applies to you.
Article 40 Ongoing oversight 1. When conducting oversight activities, in particular general investigations or inspections, the Lead Overseer shall be assisted by a joint examination team established for each critical ICT third-party service provider. 2. The joint examination team referred to in paragraph 1 shall be composed of staff members from: (a) the ESAs; (b) the relevant competent authorities supervising the financial entities to which the critical ICT third-party service provider provides ICT services; (c) the national competent authority referred to in Article 32(4), point (e), on a voluntary basis; (d) one national competent authority from the Member State where the critical ICT third-party service provider is established, on a voluntary basis. Members of the joint examination team shall have expertise in ICT matters and in operational risk. The joint examination team shall work under the coordination of a designated Lead Overseer staff member (the `Lead Overseer coordinator'). 3. Within 3 months of the completion of an investigation or inspection, the Lead Overseer, after consulting the Oversight Forum, shall adopt recommendations to be addressed to the critical ICT third-party service provider pursuant to the powers referred to in Article 35. 4. The recommendations referred to in paragraph 3 shall be immediately communicated to the critical ICT third-party service provider and to the competent authorities of the financial entities to which it provides ICT services. For the purposes of fulfilling the oversight activities, the Lead Overseer may take into consideration any relevant third-party certifications and ICT third-party internal or external audit reports made available by the critical ICT third-party service provider.
CELEX: 32022R2554 · provision: 40
Locator: Article 40; PDF page 64; derived-text line 1551
Held artifact: docs_evidence/eu-legislation/eurlex-full-text/20260823T093000Z/32022R2554.pdf
Artifact SHA-256: 85307f9e2a0409826dd0f54489645935816d16e929f0db4db3ef15badd11d38c
Captured: 20260823T093000Z
Extracted with: pdftotext version 4.00
Official source:
EUR-Lex
This version:
/celex/32022R2554/ART_40/20260823-85307f9e/
Corpus Merkle root: 581628a5b36518981241d2b51f048aa46384f30a74bf648ef542c652028cdeff
Membership proof: 10 hashes — see
corpus-proof.json
Modal verbs, counted verbatim (not a legal characterisation): 'shall not': 0 · 'shall': 6 · 'must': 0 · 'may not': 0 · 'may': 1 · 'should': 0
To verify independently: fetch the official source above, extract it with the
named tool, and confirm the artifact SHA-256 matches. Then check this provision's leaf against
the published Merkle root using the proof in corpus-proof.json.