← current version of this provision

DORA Article 37 — held text

This page is a held version, frozen at the capture below. It is a source for review. It is not advice, and it does not determine whether this provision applies to you.

Article 37 Request for information 1. The Lead Overseer may, by simple request or by decision, require critical ICT third-party service providers to provide all information that is necessary for the Lead Overseer to carry out its duties under this Regulation, including all relevant business or operational documents, contracts, policies, documentation, ICT security audit reports, ICT-related incident reports, as well as any information relating to parties to whom the critical ICT third-party service provider has outsourced operational functions or activities. 2. When sending a simple request for information under paragraph 1, the Lead Overseer shall: (a) refer to this Article as the legal basis of the request; (b) state the purpose of the request; (c) specify what information is required; (d) set a time limit within which the information is to be provided; L 333/62 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.12.2022 (e) inform the representative of the critical ICT third-party service provider from whom the information is requested that he or she is not obliged to provide the information, but in the event of a voluntary reply to the request the information provided must not be incorrect or misleading. 3. When requiring by decision to supply information under paragraph 1, the Lead Overseer shall: (a) refer to this Article as the legal basis of the request; (b) state the purpose of the request; (c) specify what information is required; (d) set a time limit within which the information is to be provided; (e) indicate the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 35(6) where the production of the required information is incomplete or when such information is not provided within the time limit referred to in point (d) of this paragraph; (f) indicate the right to appeal the decision to ESA's Board of Appeal and to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (Court of Justice) in accordance with Articles 60 and 61 of Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010. 4. The representatives of the critical ICT third-party service providers shall supply the information requested. Lawyers duly authorised to act may supply the information on behalf of their clients. The critical ICT third-party service provider shall remain fully responsible if the information supplied is incomplete, incorrect or misleading. 5. The Lead Overseer shall, without delay, transmit a copy of the decision to supply information to the competent authorities of the financial entities using the services of the relevant critical ICT third-party service providers and to the JON.
CELEX: 32022R2554 · provision: 37
Locator: Article 37; PDF page 61; derived-text line 1483
Held artifact: docs_evidence/eu-legislation/eurlex-full-text/20260823T093000Z/32022R2554.pdf
Artifact SHA-256: 85307f9e2a0409826dd0f54489645935816d16e929f0db4db3ef15badd11d38c
Captured: 20260823T093000Z
Extracted with: pdftotext version 4.00
Official source: EUR-Lex
This version: /celex/32022R2554/ART_37/20260823-85307f9e/
Corpus Merkle root: 581628a5b36518981241d2b51f048aa46384f30a74bf648ef542c652028cdeff
Membership proof: 10 hashes — see corpus-proof.json
Modal verbs, counted verbatim (not a legal characterisation): 'shall not': 0 · 'shall': 5 · 'must': 1 · 'may not': 0 · 'may': 2 · 'should': 0

To verify independently: fetch the official source above, extract it with the named tool, and confirm the artifact SHA-256 matches. Then check this provision's leaf against the published Merkle root using the proof in corpus-proof.json.